login and password compatibility
(something we know)
PureSecure
Probably the only such solution in the world that already provides all 3 components of MFA at the moment of login, without affecting the user’s UX.
The main idea in the process of designing PureSecure was for us to combine the basic mechanisms of operation of behavioral verification at the stage of logging in with the additional factor of component analysis (Device Fingerprinting), which ensures obtaining all 3 components of MFA in one moment.
As we mentioned, PureSecure’s performance focuses on the login process itself this distinguishes it from behavioural verification. Although both solutions use the same mechanisms, behaviouralverification monitors the user’s behaviour continuously, from the moment any activity begins until it ends. PureSecure, on the other hand, authenticates the login process itself by analysing:
compatibility of the device being used
(something we have) analysis whether the user is using a device which is indicated in the PureSecure database as belonging to the account owner
compatibility of the logger's signature with the signature assigned to the owner
(something we are) the signature is a set of unique behaviours of the owner, which enables its verification.
What are the advantages of PureSecure?
Solution impossible to fake - behavioural models are so unique that it is impossible for hackers to fool the system.
Positive impact on UX - does not require the user to take any action to authenticate.
Faultlessness - SMS codes may arrive late and a fingerprint may not be accepted by a faulty scanner. PureSecure always works.
Read our blog post on PureSecure if you want to find out more